Short-term Cost-effectiveness of Reteplase versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute STEMI a Tertiary Hospital in Iran

AuthorKhalil Alimohammadzadehen
AuthorRoxana Sadeghien
AuthorAli Maheren
AuthorMohammad Kazem Kazemien
Issued Date2017-07-31en
AbstractIntroduction: This study aimed to compare primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) versus reteplase in terms of clinical and para-clinical outcomes; as well as cost-effectiveness in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the method of choice in all patients especially those at higher risks. But an on-site professional team in a 24/7 facilitated system is a difficult goal to achieve in many areas and countries, therefore the cost-effectiveness of these two treatment strategies (PPCI and reteplase) needs to be discussed.en
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21859/ijcp-020305en
URIhttps://brieflands.com/journals/ijcp/articles/130070en
KeywordMyocardial infarctionen
KeywordReteplaseen
KeywordPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionen
PublisherBrieflandsen
TitleShort-term Cost-effectiveness of Reteplase versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute STEMI a Tertiary Hospital in Iranen
TypeResearch Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13419
Size:
115.76 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
Article/s PDF