Comparative Effectiveness of Teledermatology Versus In-person Consultations: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Information Elements

Abstract

Context: Teledermatology is delivered through two primary methods: Live video conferencing, which enables real-time interaction between patients and doctors, and the store-and-forward technique, where images of skin lesions are sent over the internet for later examination. Objectives: This systematic review evaluates the concordance between in-person and telemedicine follow-up methods in dermatology. Methods: In February 2024, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Medline, ISI Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library. Keywords such as "teledermatology," "telemedicine," and "mobile health" were used, following the PICOS criteria. Results: Initially, 716 articles were identified from the databases, along with four studies from the gray literature search. After removing duplicates, screening studies, and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 studies were selected for the final review. These studies detailed follow-up procedures and assessed both direct and indirect costs and effectiveness. The consensus indicates that teledermatology reduces costs and satisfies both patients and healthcare professionals. Conclusions: Teledermatology has been shown to potentially increase the efficiency of follow-up care compared to traditional methods. However, further research is needed to develop standardized evaluation protocols and to more accurately measure and validate key variables. Publications suggest that teledermatology is cost-effective, reduces patient wait times, extends access to dermatological care in remote areas, and enhances satisfaction among patients, doctors, and nurses.