Comparison of tubal ligation by minilaparotomy (Pomeroy) and laparrscopy (Filsie-Clips)
| Author | F Amidi | en |
| Author | S Naseri | en |
| Issued Date | 2000-09-30 | en |
| Abstract | Abstract Background: Finding, low cost and safe way for tubal ligation, is of great importance. Objective: To determine duration of operation, recovery, hospitalization and complications (up to one week) in both methods. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, 30 patients were elected for minilaparotomy (pomeroy) and 30 other patients for laparoscopy (Filshie-Clips). Duration of surgery, recovery, hospitalization and complications were compared. Findings: Duration of surgery and recovery were the same in both methods. Hospitalization was less in laparoscopic group (8 ± 13.39 hr vs 18.6 ± 16.22 hr). Vomiting and nausea was more in laparoscopic group (10% vs 3.3%). There were not any complication in laparoscopic group after 1 week, but there were 4 cases with edema and erythema, pain (infection) around their incisions in minilaparotomy group (0% vs 13.3%). Conclusion: The findings indicated that tubal ligation by laparoscopy and Filshie-Clips is better and simpler. | en |
| DOI | https://doi.org/ | en |
| Keyword | Keywords: Tubal Ligation | en |
| Keyword | Filshie-Clips | en |
| Keyword | Laparoscopy | en |
| Publisher | Brieflands | en |
| Title | Comparison of tubal ligation by minilaparotomy (Pomeroy) and laparrscopy (Filsie-Clips) | en |
| Type | Research Article | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- article-1-373-en.pdf.pdf
- Size:
- 865.78 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Article/s PDF