Long-term Follow-up of Hepatobiliary Fascioliasis: Serologic and Computed Tomography Findings

Abstract

Background: Hepatobiliary fascioliasis (HF) is a significant public health concern. In humans, the diagnosis of fasciolosis typically relies on parasitological, immunological, and radiologic findings. Previous studies have documented long-term radiological findings post-treatment. However, there is insufficient data on the long-term follow-up of radiological results combined with anti-Fasciola antibody levels, which are crucial for diagnosing the disease. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term laboratory findings, antibody levels, and radiological features following the treatment of patients with HF. Methods: This retrospective study included 25 patients with HF at Dicle University Medical Faculty Hospital from March 2009 to December 2015. Baseline and follow-up laboratory tests, anti-Fasciola antibody levels (mean follow-up: 43.0 ± 10.3 months post-treatment), and radiological results (mean follow-up: 37.9 ± 13.5 months post-treatment) were recorded. The follow-up results were compared with baseline data. Results: The study included 25 patients (20 female; mean age: 40.6 ± 11.7 years) diagnosed with HF. Significant changes were observed in eosinophil counts and Fasciola antibody levels. Antibody levels decreased in all patients, with antibody negativity developing in 40% (n = 10) of the patients. Biliary changes and intra-abdominal fluid resolved completely in all patients. Marked radiologic improvements were noted in lymphadenopathy, liver lesions, and splenomegaly. Both antibody negativity and radiological improvement were observed in 16% (n = 4) of the patients. No correlation was found between radiological improvement and antibody negativity or other parameters. Conclusions: In patients with HF, achieving antibody negativity and radiological improvement may require a prolonged period. During follow-up, radiological imaging and antibody levels should be interpreted cautiously in treated individuals whose laboratory tests, such as eosinophil count, are within the normal range.

Description

Keywords

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By