Comparing Clinical Learning Effectiveness among Lecture-Based Training, Simulation-based Training and Training using Animal Tissue Models

AuthorLaw Ping Keungen
AuthorCheung Wai Kwan Ericen
AuthorChan Yeuk Wai Elaineen
AuthorCheng Ka Loken
AuthorWong Yau Hang Henryen
AuthorKam Chak Wahen
OrcidLaw Ping Keung []en
OrcidCheung Wai Kwan Eric []en
OrcidChan Yeuk Wai Elaine []en
OrcidCheng Ka Lok []en
OrcidWong Yau Hang Henry []en
OrcidKam Chak Wah []en
Issued Date2018-03-31en
AbstractBackground: To compare simulation-based teaching (SIM), lecture-based teaching (LEC), and teaching using animal tissue (ANT) in terms of student’s satisfaction, knowledge gain and learning efficiency.Method: All the students who attended the courses organized by the CSTC from 1st Jan 2013 to 31st Dec 2015 were enrolled in the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire delivered at the end of the course. The questionnaire contained 15 questions using a ten-point Likert scale to rate the students’ satisfaction of the course and also the competence before and after the course.Result: 5024 questionnaires were collected with a response rate of 67%. Students demonstrate a higher post-courses score in SIM, LEC, and ANT (Pen
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v17i1.18091en
KeywordLearning Effectivenessen
KeywordLectureen
KeywordSimulationen
PublisherBrieflandsen
TitleComparing Clinical Learning Effectiveness among Lecture-Based Training, Simulation-based Training and Training using Animal Tissue Modelsen
TypeResearch Articleen

Files