Comparison of Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network Models to Evaluate Diagnostic Factors in the Necessity to Perform Angiography

AuthorParastoo Golpouren
AuthorMohammad Tajfarden
AuthorMajid Ghayour-Mobarhanen
AuthorMohsen Moohebatien
AuthorAli Taghipouren
Authorhabibollah Esmailyen
AuthorSara Sabbaghian Tousien
OrcidParastoo Golpour [0000-0001-7147-9539]en
OrcidMohammad Tajfard [0000-0002-2867-8759]en
OrcidMajid Ghayour-Mobarhan [0000-0002-1081-6754]en
OrcidAli Taghipour [0000-0001-7594-0097]en
Orcidhabibollah Esmaily [0000-0003-4139-546X]en
OrcidSara Sabbaghian Tousi [0000-0003-4234-6344]en
Issued Date2022-06-30en
AbstractBackground: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is the most common type of cardiovascular disorders. Despite being costly and invasive, coronary angiography is a reliable method for diagnosing CAD. Therefore, it is crucial to use non-invasive methods to screen candidates for angiography to accelerate the process of decision-making. Two powerful Machine Learning (ML) methods are Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN).  en
DOIhttps://doi.org/en
KeywordArtificial Neural Networken
KeywordRandom Foresten
KeywordAngiographyen
KeywordMachine Learningen
KeywordCoronary Artery Diseaseen
KeywordRisk factoren
PublisherShiraz University of Medical Sciencesen
TitleComparison of Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network Models to Evaluate Diagnostic Factors in the Necessity to Perform Angiographyen
TypeResearch Articleen

Files