Comparison of the Sedation Quality of Etomidate, Propofol, and Midazolam in Combination with Fentanyl During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial

AuthorLeili Adinehmehren
AuthorHamidreza Shetabien
AuthorDarioush Moradi Farsanien
AuthorAli Salehien
AuthorMohadese Noorbakhshen
OrcidLeili Adinehmehr [0000-0001-7870-4049]en
OrcidHamidreza Shetabi [0000-0002-5165-8385]en
OrcidDarioush Moradi Farsani [0000-0003-2192-1610]en
Issued Date2019-04-30en
AbstractBackground: According to the favorable effects of combination therapy to provide better sedation during phacoemulsification and lack of any studies investigating the sedative effect of etomidate, propofol, and midazolam in combination with fentanyl during the procedure. Objectives: The current study aimed at comparing the sedative properties of the mentioned three combination therapies in this field. Methods: The current double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on patients referred for elective phacoemulsification surgery under sedation. They were randomly allocated to the three groups to receive fentanyl plus one of the following medications: Propofol, midazolam, and etomidate. Demographic characteristics, medical condition, and hemodynamic parameters before, during, and after surgery, sedation level, anesthetic complications, sedation-related adverse events, and patients’ and surgeons’ satisfaction were evaluated and recorded by the anesthesiologist and compared in the three studied groups. Results: In the current study, out of 150 enrolled patients, 98 completed the study. Frequency of different levels of Ramsay scores was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.41). Frequency of Ramsay scores 3 and 4 was 92%, 79.4%, and 88.2% in etomidate, midazolam and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.32). The median recovery time was significantly higher in the midazolam group than the propofol group (P = 0.04); intergroup comparisons indicated that the patients’ mean score of satisfaction in the propofol group was significantly higher than that of the etomidate group (P = 0.006). Conclusions: The current study findings indicated that though the quality of sedation during phacoemulsification cataract surgery was acceptable in the three agents and the results had no significantly differences among the groups, and considering other factors including recovery time, hemodynamic evaluation, sedation-related complications, and patients’ satisfication scores, it is suggested that propofol was superior to the other two agents.en
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.87415en
KeywordSedationen
KeywordEtomidateen
KeywordPropofolen
KeywordMidazolamen
KeywordPhacoemulsificationen
PublisherBrieflandsen
TitleComparison of the Sedation Quality of Etomidate, Propofol, and Midazolam in Combination with Fentanyl During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trialen
TypeResearch Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
aapm-9-2-87415.pdf
Size:
142.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article/s PDF