Comparison of Block’s Quality and Complications After Spinal Anesthesia Using Two Different Doses of Marcaine and Fentanyl in Leg Fracture Surgery in Opium Abuser: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Inducing analgesia in patients is a primary goal of anesthesia, achieved through various methods and drugs. Objectives: The present study compares the block quality and complications associated with different doses of Marcaine and fentanyl during spinal anesthesia for leg fracture surgery in opium abusers. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 80 patients with a history of opium abuse, classified as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I or II, who presented with leg fractures at Vali-Asr Hospital in 2020 - 2021, were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two groups. Group A (40 patients) received 15 mg of Marcaine and 10 μg of fentanyl intrathecally. Group B (40 patients) received 12.5 mg of Marcaine and 25 μg of fentanyl intrathecally. The duration of sensory block, incidence of nausea, vomiting, shivering, itching, and duration of painlessness were recorded on a checklist for both groups. Data were analyzed using chi-square and independent t-test in SPSS version 21 software (P = 0.05). Results: Eighty leg fracture patients participated. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or anesthesia class between the two groups. The duration of motor block return was significantly longer in group A compared to group B (115.23 ± 42.71 vs. 63.35 ± 24.5 minutes) (P < 0.001). Group B had a longer duration of analgesia (148 ± 27 minutes) compared to group A (90 ± 34 minutes). There was no significant difference in complications (nausea, vomiting, shivering, and itching). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.001). Group A had significantly higher average pethidine consumption compared to group B. Conclusions: Higher fentanyl doses resulted in less pain without increasing complications. This method is recommended for spinal anesthesia in addicted patients.

Description

Keywords

Citation

URI

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By