Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes

AuthorHamid Reza Khayat Kashanien
AuthorSaeed Mohammad Soleymanien
AuthorSohrab Salimien
AuthorAhmadreza Vahdatien
AuthorPooyan Alizadehen
AuthorSohrab Sadeghien
AuthorMohsen Kooshaen
AuthorShirzad Azharien
AuthorHadi Esmailyen
OrcidHamid Reza Khayat Kashani [0000-0003-3711-6763]en
OrcidSaeed Mohammad Soleymani [0000-0003-1462-3930]en
OrcidSohrab Salimi [0000-0002-9464-2703]en
OrcidAhmadreza Vahdati [0009-0008-5255-6082]en
OrcidPooyan Alizadeh [0000-0002-4490-9553]en
OrcidSohrab Sadeghi [0000-0003-3723-4321]en
OrcidMohsen Koosha [0000-0002-1660-3178]en
OrcidShirzad Azhari [0000-0003-2049-184X]en
OrcidHadi Esmaily [0000-0001-6915-6028]en
Issued Date2025-04-30en
AbstractBackground: Spinal surgery can be performed under either general anesthesia (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA). Objectives: This study compared outcomes between two groups of patients undergoing spinal neurosurgery with RA versus GA. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in the Neurosurgery Ward of Imam Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from 2021-08-23 to 2022-08-23. Of 126 patients initially enrolled for spinal surgery, 26 were excluded. The remaining 100 patients were randomized into GA (n = 49) and RA (n = 51) groups. The primary outcome was operation duration. Secondary outcomes included blood loss, pain, hospital stay, and vital signs. Results: Baseline characteristics (mean age, gender, and surgery type) were similar between groups. Operation duration and anesthesia time were significantly shorter in the RA group [80.8 ± 27.9 vs 104.1 ± 43.7 minutes (P = 0.002) and 121.0 ± 30.6 vs 148.3 ± 43.8 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively]. Bleeding, nausea, and vomiting were higher in the RA group, while muscle relaxation was greater in the GA group (P < 0.05). Acetaminophen consumption was significantly higher in the GA group (P = 0.011). Both patient and surgeon satisfaction were significantly higher with RA (P < 0.05). Hemodynamics and headache incidence were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Regional anesthesia resulted in shorter surgery times and was preferred by both patients and surgeons for spinal procedures. Additionally, RA significantly reduced the need for analgesic administration.en
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5812/ans-159795en
URIhttps://brieflands.com/journals/ans/articles/159795en
KeywordSpinal Surgeryen
KeywordDiscectomyen
KeywordRegional Anesthesiaen
KeywordGeneral Anesthesiaen
PublisherBrieflandsen
TitleRegional Versus General Anesthesia for Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomesen
TypeResearch Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ans-12-2-159795-publish-pdf.pdf
Size:
306.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article/s PDF